Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In accordance with the EPA price schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be intended for redistribution on the internet or for commercial purposes.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal to the deceased was caused via the petitioner but in support of opinion with the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is accessible on the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not binding over the Court.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of law.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained about the record to connect the petitioner with the commission with the alleged offence. Although punishment of your alleged offence does not tumble from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit on the petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
Free case law sites in Pakistan are priceless resources for any person needing to understand Pakistani regulation. By utilizing the ideas and techniques outlined in this article, it is possible to navigate these resources effectively and conduct extensive legal research.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a chance of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to think about all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
Section 302 in the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're in the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion could be thought of, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual here service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.
[three] For example, in England, the High Court as well as the Court of Appeals are each bound by their individual previous decisions, however, since the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, although in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is definitely the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom ruled that it as well as the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the legislation for nearly 30 years.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to be suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)